It managed to score 726.4, while the standard Chrome could only score 435.7. The M1 Chrome once again maintained the lead in Motion Mark 1.1 test. Meanwhile, the M1 Chrome scored 156 on Jetstream 2 test while the standard Chrome scored 93.1. The M1 Chrome scored 210 in the Speedometer 2.0 test, while the Standard Chrome scored just 116. Talking numbers, the M1 version Chrome performed nearly 66-85 percent better than the Rosetta 2 version. The M1 Chrome has aced in all the benchmarks and is faster than the x86 version running on Rosetta 2. The best part is that this version of Chrome runs faster than the one on Rosetta 2.Īrstechnica has put the new M1 Chrome version to test that includes a series of benchmarks like Speedometer 2.0, JetStream2, and Motion Mark 1.1. New MacBook Air, 13-inch MacBook Pro, and Mac mini users have to download a different Chrome version. Last week Google released a Chrome browser for Macs powered by M1 Chip. Microsoft and Google have also been working closely to add a Windows 10 dual-boot option to Chromebooks recently, codenamed “Campfire.” If the two companies are working more closely on these types of projects, it does show that the Scroogled days are well and truly in the past.Earlier this month, Apple unveiled M1 Chip Macs touting significant performance improvement. Microsoft and Google’s work could still help improve performance for Electron-based apps like Slack and Visual Studio Code which rely on parts of Chromium. Unless Microsoft relaxes its rules then this native Chrome support for Windows on ARM won’t be found in the Windows Store. Those policies restrict rival browsers to using Microsoft’s own Edge rendering engine, specifically that “products that browse the web must use the appropriate HTML and JavaScript engines provided by the Windows Platform.” Microsoft also blocked similar browser apps for Windows 8. However, it was only last year that Microsoft pulled Google’s Chrome installer from the Windows Store, because it violated store policies. Chrome is one of the most popular desktop apps available on Windows 10, and without a native version for ARM it’s difficult to take ARM-powered Windows 10 devices seriously for many. The details follow claims by a Qualcomm executive last month that the chip maker was working on an ARM version of Chrome for Windows 10.Ī native ARM version of Chrome would make a lot of sense for Qualcomm, Microsoft, and Google. 9to5Google has spotted various commits by Microsoft engineers assisting with the development of Chrome for Windows 10 on ARM. Microsoft and Google engineers appear to be collaborating to support a version of Chrome running on Windows on ARM.

Google chrome browser download chip